On Sat, 2026-01-31 at 15:49 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > Op 31 jan 2026 om 03:47 heeft hongxu via lists.openembedded.org
> > <[email protected]> het volgende
> > geschreven:
> > 
> > On 1/31/26 00:56, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > CAUTION: This email comes from a non Wind River email account!
> > > Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
> > > sender and know the content is safe.
> > > 
> > > Hi Hongxu,
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, 2026-01-30 at 13:20 +0800, hongxu via
> > > > lists.openembedded.org wrote:
> > > > Would you please approve to add this layer to
> > > > https://git.yoctoproject.org/, I will maintain
> > > > meta-ollama for recipe uprev and bug fix
> > > Thanks for sharing this, it looks really interesting and I like
> > > the
> > > idea of it a lot.
> 
> Great timing as well :) I’m currently at FOSDEM asking around how
> people would feel about a meta-ai layer that would have various bits
> in it: tflite, onnx-runtime, llama.cpp and other things that need
> compilation.
> 
> At the OE BoF this morning I was pointed at this thread, so I’ll hook
> into that to ask:
> 
> How would people feel about a layer that combines at least the
> runtimes and has active maintainers?
> 
> The amount of ai/ml recipes I touch daily has grown too large to
> stuff in in the qcom-distro layer, but are also to spread out in
> other (vendor) layers to include by default.

Keep in mind that putting all "AI" into one place might work out a bit
like putting all "python" or all "perl" recipes in one place has. We're
learning that may not be the best way to handle it.

I do like the idea of small focused layers with an active maintainer
rather than something like meta-oe which becomes very hard to maintain
(or change).

We could have a configuration which checked out and pulled together all
the different known 'AI' layers if that would be useful as a compromise
to make it more accessible/discoverable?

If the tools to handle layers are the problem and putting people off
the smaller layers, we should fix that too...

Cheers,

Richard



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2225): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2225
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/117540395/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to