On Wed, 2026-05-27 at 14:16 +0000, Daniel Turull wrote:
> To help with the updates, allowing ptest to be backported could also
> help on finding issues in the recipe updates or CVE backporting.

ptests are not good candidates for backports. We have huge amounts of
problems with them in master, let alone the stable backports. Very few
actually dive in and try and fix the issues in master. The new patches
often seem to be AI generated and contain questionable cod. All my
experience says backporting them is a really bad idea.

Sorry, but definitely no from me.

Cheers,

Richard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2358): 
https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/message/2358
Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/119437109/21656
Group Owner: [email protected]
Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-architecture/unsub 
[[email protected]]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  • [Openembedded-architecture] ... Chen Qi via lists.openembedded.org
    • Re: [Openembedded-archi... Daniel Turull via lists.openembedded.org
      • Re: [Openembedded-a... Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
        • Re: [Openembedd... Mark Hatle
          • Re: [Openem... Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org
            • Re: [O... Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org
              • Re... Peter Marko via lists.openembedded.org
                • ... Alexander Kanavin via lists.openembedded.org
                • ... Peter Kjellerstedt via lists.openembedded.org
                • ... Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
            • Re: [O... Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org
              • Re... Daniel Turull via lists.openembedded.org
                • ... Richard Purdie via lists.openembedded.org

Reply via email to