On Wed Sep 2, 2026 at 11:59 AM CEST, Daniel Turull via lists.openembedded.org wrote: > From: Chen Qi <[email protected]> > > We want the ability to do stable version upgrades for recipes. > To this end, add an optional stable_upgrade parameter to the > get_recipe_upgrade_status function, which defaults to False and > when enabled will try to get the latest stable version of the recipe. > > The UPSTREAM_STABLE_RELEASE_REGEX is respected. If a recipe sets > it, it will be used as the filter_regex. If it's not set explicitly, > it means that there's no stable updates or the recipe hasn't been > checked yet. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Qi <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Antonin Godard <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> > (cherry picked from commit 1ed8fdda035dcc21f3df71c0c996973224f4f683) > Signed-off-by: Daniel Turull <[email protected]> > --- > meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > index c6604f536d..7c1df518a8 100644 > --- a/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > +++ b/meta/lib/oe/recipeutils.py > @@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ def get_recipe_pv_with_pfx_sfx(pv, uri_type): > > return (pv, pfx, sfx) > > -def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd): > +def get_recipe_upstream_version(rd, stable_upgrade):
I plan to backport the follow-up as well: 6f8ae1ecf38 (lib/oe/recipeutils: make stable_upgrade argument optional in get_recipe_upstream_version(), 2026-06-08) What do you think? Thanks! -- Yoann Congal Smile ECS
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#245975): https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/message/245975 Mute This Topic: https://lists.openembedded.org/mt/121048520/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://lists.openembedded.org/g/openembedded-core/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
