On 04/15/2011 09:38 PM, Yu Ke wrote:
On 2011/4/16 0:42, Saul Wold wrote:
On 04/14/2011 10:44 PM, Yu Ke wrote:
From: Yu Ke<[email protected]>
- also remove the talloc-removal.patch because it is already
included in this version
Signed-off-by: Yu Ke<[email protected]>
---
.../distro/include/preferred-xorg-versions.inc | 2 +-
.../mesa/files/talloc-removal.patch |15571 --------------------
.../mesa/{mesa-dri_7.10.bb => mesa-dri_7.10.2.bb} | 7 +-
.../{mesa-xlib_7.10.bb => mesa-xlib_7.10.2.bb} | 7 +-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15580 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/files/talloc-removal.patch
rename meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/{mesa-dri_7.10.bb =>
mesa-dri_7.10.2.bb} (85%)
rename meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/{mesa-xlib_7.10.bb =>
mesa-xlib_7.10.2.bb} (68%)
Ke,
I noticed other patches for both the 7.10.2 version and GIT version in
the mesa-dri directory. Also is there a reason we are carrying around
older versions of mesa-dri?
I am looking at the overall clean state of things as we move forward.
Thanks
Sau!
Thanks for pointing it out. Yes, I will add Upstream-Status tag to those
patches. The old versions 7.8.2 is kept for GPLv3 talloc workaround, The
other old 7.5 and 7.7 version is just legacy recipe from poky. These old
recipes can be removed safely. I will make patch to remove it.
BTW, I notice this mesa upgrade patch is already in your staging branch
(http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=distro/stage),
so should I make a incremental patch base on this, or make a V3 mesa
upgrade patch base on master branch?
Ke,
Yes, I have been testing what I have currently, so an incremental patch
would be better at this point.
Sau!
Regards
Ke
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
