On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 09:34:55AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:00 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > > --- > > meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb | 5 ++++- > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb > > b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb > > index 138e617..10f3af4 100644 > > --- a/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb > > +++ b/meta/recipes-core/tasks/task-base.bb > > @@ -179,8 +179,11 @@ RDEPENDS_task-base-acpi = "\ > > acpid \ > > libacpi " > > > > +# Distro can override apm provider > > +DISTRO_APM ?= "apm" > > + > > RDEPENDS_task-base-apm = "\ > > - apm \ > > + ${DISTRO_APM} \ > > apmd" > > Can you explain a little more about why a distro would do this please? > I'm a little worried this whole file could become a set of DISTRO_* > variables :/. > > Cheers, > > Richard
For example in SHR we're using FSO which provides apm replacement called fso-apm which conflicts with standard apm. We can rename it to VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_apm (like VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives) if you prefer such namespace. Cheers, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
