On 04/24/2011 10:14 PM, Cui, Dexuan wrote: > Hi Saul, > I prefer "continue with UST disabled in gdb" for now. > Ok, I have a patch queue'ed up already with this fix, I will push it as part of a consolidated request later tonight.
> I'm investigating more to get an in-depth understanding about the issue. > e.g., ust-0.11 doesn't break building gdb while ust-0.12 does -- however both > 0.11 and 0.12 install /usr/include/ust/. > I agree, I am not sure why this is happening also, I thought that I did installs of 0.11 and did not see the ust directory, maybe I did not force or something. Maybe diff the marker.h files and see if there are differences? Sau! > Thanks, > -- Dexuan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cui, Dexuan > Sent: 2011年4月25日 9:57 > To: 'Saul Wold'; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: gdb and lttng-ust 0.12 > > Hi Saul, > Thanks very much for the investigation! > I can reproduce the issue now when I build gdb after building lttng-ust > (previously looks I built them in the reverse order, so didn't catch it.) > > I haven't understood why this issue occurred after I upgraded ust from 0.11 > to 0.12 as 0.11 actually installs /usr/include/ust, too. And gdb was not > upgraded recently. > > I'm looking into this now and will update asap. > > Thanks, > -- Dexuan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Saul Wold [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 2011年4月25日 4:17 > To: Cui, Dexuan; 'Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer' > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: gdb and lttng-ust 0.12 > > > Dexuan, > > It seems that when you updated lttng-ust to 0.12, it installed an > /usr/include/ust directory that GDB now finds. This caused the > gdbserver code to not build. > > I investigated this and it seems to be due to gdb having a dependency on > UST that causes GDB not to compile. I think at this point we may want > to continue with UST disabled in gdb. > > To reproduce this, ensure that lttng-ust-0.12 is built before building > gdb and you should see a compilation failure. > > My concern here is that if fix the GDB compilation failures, what else > is going to fail as far as debugging with UST enabled on the remote, I > know this feature is something we want, and should probably report to > the GDB upstream. > > The fix seems to be as simple as adding "--without-ust" to the gdb > EXTRA_OECONF line. > > Comments? > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
