On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 10:51 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Darren Hart <dvh...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 04/25/2011 10:14 AM, Gary Thomas wrote: > > > > Right, so for clarification, for 2.4 kernels, images should be built > > using just the modutils_2.4.27.bb recipe. For 2.6 kernels, images should > > be built using module_init_tools and modutils-initscripts. > > > > In oe-core, task-base requires module-init-tools and task-core-boot > > requires modutils-initscripts. That actually seems backwards to me as > > modutils-initscripts is useless without module-init-tools. > > > > There is a considerable amount of cruft in the kernel base classes > > related to older kernels which I'd like to see purged. Perhaps a > > meta-linux-2.4 layer would be a good place to keep things like these as > > well as the modutils_2.4.27 recipe. > > Do we have usecases to even support 2.4 anymore ? I would suggest > to remove it if no use cases are reported.
I think the time has come for OE-Core to clean out kernel.bbclass of the 2.4 code. If anyone does want to support 2.4, they can do it with a separate kernel-2.4 class. Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core