On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 04:01:06PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: > On 05/10/2011 12:18 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: > > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 15:55, Tom Rini <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Add a -l switch that takes an argument of either github or gitorious > >> and will make the cover letter have a fill-in-the-blank of where the > >> changes are on either github or gitorious. > > > > Another possibility would be to use git config interface to store > > those. You might have something like: > > > > [oe-core-pull-request] > > mode = github > > user = foo > > > > or > > > > [oe-core-pull-request] > > mode = gitorious > > user = bar > > > > This could be used to fill the fields in a proper way since those are > > predictable. > > If I had a good bit more time, I might re-write the script in python and > parse .ini files (same syntax as gitconfig) so that lots of useful > defaults could be saved. But here's the real test, given that you're an > intended user, would you use the -l switch or just make a local change > to the script like Martin showed?
I would still use local copy of script just because in this case it has selective name and I can find it already with right params in bash history. To have the same comfort with -l switch you would have to provide bash completition config :). And yes -l switch is good thing, I can replace my copies with simple alias now.. Regards, -- Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
