Op 11 mei 2011, om 18:15 heeft Darren Hart het volgende geschreven: > Between myself and others, there are several outstanding proposals to > modify the pull-request scripts. Patches have been sent, but nothing has > been merged due to a lack of consensus. I thought I would summarize what > I see to be the current weaknesses of the scripts and my proposal to > address them. I would like your feedback to ensure we have tools that > meet the needs of a broad user base. Once we agree, I'll be happy to > write up the patches or help review those written by others. > > 1) send-pull-request is too aggressive with the auto-cc feature (Khem > Raj) > > One of the reasons I wrote these scripts was out of frustration with > git-send-email which allowed for a cover letter, but didn't include > all the collected addresses on it. The current script sends every > message to all the collected addresses. Khem (and others) have found > this behavior to be sub-optimal, if not down right annoying. > > I propose it be modified to only use the addresses local to each > patch for the patches and all the collected addresses only for the > cover letter. > > a) Do people agree with this policy? If not, and people prefer the > cover-letter only be sent to the recipients specified on the > command line, then this script doesn't add any real value over > 'git request-pull' and 'git send-email', and users can easily > wrap those on their own.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the current script pick up address from the patches inside the patches as well. The CC: list should only contain the "OE" people involved, not random kernel hackers mentioning in the patches. regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
