On (16/05/11 21:11), Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 10:01 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: > > > I've just been trying to build a uclibc-based system from the current > > > head of oe-core but this doesn't seem to be something that works > > > entirely smoothly at the moment. Does anybody have a patchset to fix > > > the uclibc recipes, or is anybody working on such a thing? > > > > > > > I have not fixed uclibc in oe-core yet but if you use > > meta-openembedded layer along with oe-core > > then the uclibc in that layer should work pretty well on top of > > oe-core. Eventually > > it should move into oe-core one of these days. > > I just tried that and now I get a failure in gcc-intermediate due to > missing linux/limits.h. Not quite sure what's gone wrong there.
hmmm kernel-headers may be missing some bits. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- -Khem _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core