On 05/24/2011 11:32 PM, Saul Wold wrote: > On 05/24/2011 03:31 PM, Darren Hart wrote: >> From: Darren Hart<[email protected]> >> >> The following changes since commit 32a4e746273c3c7d3dd0f13b745bc0679cadaa44: >> >> codeparser.py: fix syntax error in exception handling (2011-05-24 >> 17:16:47 +0100) >> >> are available in the git repository at: >> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib.git dvhart/build >> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=dvhart/build >> >> Darren Hart (1): >> oe-setup-builddir: remove unreachable code, update comments >> >> scripts/create-pull-request | 2 +- >> scripts/oe-setup-builddir | 32 +++++++++++++------------------- >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> > If this is intended for oe-core, please rebase to oe-core and resend, I > had a merge issue and want to make sure I am getting the right code > committed.
Gah, right. I saw the oe- in the script name and just had oe-core in my head. Apologies. The two scripts are slightly different in the two repositories, but both suffer from the same unreachable code problem. Would you prefer I send two patches, one for each repository, or that I push to one or the other and let you handle the merge process as part of the regular sync up process (whatever that is). Before I do that - are people in agreement with the approach? ie Should I be removing the unreachable code or should I instead making it usable again, reestablishing the functionality of OELOCALCONF and OELAYERSCONF? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
