Op 14 jun 2011, om 11:28 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven: > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:12 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Phil Blundell <p...@pbcl.net> wrote: >>> On Sun, 2011-06-12 at 21:03 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >>>> This patch brings in new patches from gcc 4.6 FSF branch >>>> And refreshes the headers of existing backported patches >>>> to not have git patch numbers in comments >>>> >>>> I am not sending the patch itself to mailing list due to its >>>> large size so please review it on the contrib tree itself >>>> >>> >>> Would we not be better off just pulling the tip of the 4.6 branch from >>> FSF SVN, rather than having to keep all these patches in git? >>> >> >> there is dislike for this approach in oe-core. As the release point is >> preferred >> I suggested to drop the minor release number and call the recipes 4.6 >> and use SVN >> REVs to track the recipe updates but it did not fly :) > > Where does that dislike come from? Koen did make a comment about having > liked svn checkouts for 4.5 "very, very much" but I couldn't quite > figure out whether he was being sarcastic or not and, if so, what > exactly his objection was.
I wasn't being sarcastic, I really like it very, very much. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
