Op 14 jun 2011, om 23:13 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven:
> PACKAGE_ARCH is set to BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH so we do not
> need to define it here since we already define BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH
>
> angstrom sets FEED_ARCH like
>
> FEED_ARCH ?= "${BASE_PACKAGE_ARCH}"
>
> and 'all' doesnt go well for FEED_ARCH as it ends up with
> parsing error for x86 machines.
>
> This might be a latent bug in bitbake but allarch.bbclass
> excavated it and we burry it in the same class.
>
> This makes the behavior same as it was before allarch.bbclass
> where we set PACKAGE_ARCH = all for common packages
>
> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com>
Just to repeat the questions you answered on IRC already:
this will still result in a foo_1.0_all.ipk, right? So I don't have to
recreated the feeds *again* as I needed to do after the
machine-name->machine_name changes?
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
