On 06/14/2011 08:38 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 14 jun 2011, om 17:30 heeft Phil Blundell het volgende geschreven:
This is not particularly pretty but I couldn't think of any obviously
better way of doing it. Any suggestions?
Signed-off-by: Phil Blundell<[email protected]>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
index 4b90972..5a41970 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-cross.inc
@@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ EXTRA_OECONF = "--with-sysroot=${STAGING_DIR_TARGET} \
--program-prefix=${TARGET_PREFIX} \
--disable-install-libbfd \
--disable-werror \
- --enable-poison-system-directories"
+ --enable-poison-system-directories \
+ ${@base_contains('DISTRO_FEATURES', 'ld-is-gold',
'--enable-gold=default', '', d)}"
Out of curiousity, how well does gold work nowadays? Last I remember hearing of
it was in its x86-only days.
it works well on arm in fact link times are way better on some
(especially C++) applications using gold. We can try to use gold for
x86, x86_64 and arm to start with.
regards,
Koen
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
