On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 21:03, Anders Darander
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 20:46, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 20:18 +0200, Anders Darander wrote:
>>> -PROVIDES += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod 
>>> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6"
>>> +PROVIDES += "virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod 
>>> virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-2.6 virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}depmod-3"
>>
>> Can we not just ditch the versioned virtuals and have all the
>> dependencies use plain virtual/depmod now?
>
> Well, when thinking about it, that sounds like a good idea. If we are
> ditching 2.4-support, as in my patches, there will only be one module
> format, as well as one depmod (or two, if we count the busybox
> version).

I'll try to address this, as well as an update to module-init-tools 3.16 in a
v2. It'll probably take a few days before I can find the time necessary, though.

Regards,
Anders

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to