On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 01:40 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Op 22 jun 2011, om 18:00 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > > > >> On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 18:43 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >>> changes since V1 > >>> > >>> Separate out non gcc changes to a different pull request > >>> Patches are not attached inline due to sheer size of them > >>> as they might choke patchwork. The are only on the branch > >>> > >>> The following changes since commit > >>> 78de64f58b98101f5be5778e9ecbdaae5ba32997: > >>> > >>> binutils_2.21.bb: Fix ld segfault exposed by eglibc 2.14 on x86_64 > >>> (2011-06-21 17:58:06 -0700) > >>> > >>> are available in the git repository at: > >>> git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib kraj/gcc-4.6 > >>> > >>> http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/gcc-4.6 > >>> > >>> Khem Raj (2): > >>> gcc-4.6: Switch to using svn SRC_URI for recipe > >>> tcmode-default.inc: use 4.6 for GCCVERSION and SDKGCCVERSION > >> > >> I'm afraid I don't like having "gcc 4.6" being so publicly visible. Its > >> fine for the recipe names but the PV itself really needs to be something > >> like "4.6.2+svn". > >> > >> I say this as a person who'd have to deal with people claiming we're > >> behind on gcc since we were on 4.6[.0] :/ > > > > There will always be people claiming nonsense about numbers :) > > Hi Richard > > I have pushed updated patches to the branch now. PV is set to > 4.6.0+svnr${SRCPV} > and we use wild card in choosing gcc version
Merged to master, thanks. Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
