Op 23 jun 2011, om 18:51 heeft Tom Rini het volgende geschreven:

On 06/23/2011 09:15 AM, Tom Rini wrote:
On 06/23/2011 08:29 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 17:20 -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
As part of looking into the problem I had that I just posted a patch for I was going "why isn't -c clean (or cleanall or cleansstate) knocking out STAGING_DIR_KERNEL contents? Answer, sstate is totally skipping that out. Is there some variable we need to be setting somewhere to add this in? Or are we going to have to take in the various bits of OE.dev
kernel.bbclass instead here?

I think there is a bug in kernel.bbclass. This should fix it:

diff --git a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass b/meta/classes/ kernel.bbclass
index aaf341b..9f09107 100644
--- a/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
+++ b/meta/classes/kernel.bbclass
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ kernel_do_install() {
# Support for external module building - create a minimal copy of the
       # kernel source tree.
       #
-       kerneldir=${STAGING_KERNEL_DIR}
+       kerneldir=${D}/kernel
       install -d $kerneldir

       #

I'll merge something like this is nobody objects.

That makes sense, testing this now.

Yeah, that does it.

Tested-by: Tom Rini <tom_r...@mentor.com>

Koen, once this is in oe-core need a request to bring it over too or
just want to come grab it?

I have it applied locally, just waiting for it to land in oe-core so I can transplant the commit headers :)

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to