On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Phil Blundell <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 12:41 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: >> After the last cleanup. armeb/uClibc.machine >> gets picked up by default for ARM Big endian >> so bring it uptodate. > >> -UCLIBC_HAS_FPU=y >> +# UCLIBC_HAS_FPU is not set >> +UCLIBC_HAS_SOFT_FLOAT=y > > Is this deliberate? That seems to be a change in behaviour but it isn't > mentioned in the commit message.
yes forgot that though. > > More generally, does armeb really need its own config file? thanks for pointing it out. Indeed it does not need its own config file since we already munge the endianness based on TARGET_ARCH in uclibc-config.inc I think thats a better approach to delete it. Let me see how that pans out It seems as > though there shouldn't be any difference between arm and armeb except > endianness, and it should be fairly trivial to select that automatically > in the same way as we do the other uClibc config customisations. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core > _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
