Op 29 jun 2011, om 10:50 heeft Anders Darander het volgende geschreven: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:24, Koen Kooi <[email protected]> wrote: >> Op 29 jun 2011, om 00:41 heeft Khem Raj het volgende geschreven: >>> If they are independent then may be the openssh recipe should be >>> divided into openssh-ssh and openssh-rest so one can use openssh >>> provided daemon or dropbear provided as they wish >> >> Dividing the openssl recipe would gain us little and the gains would be only >> for the power companies since you'd have to build openssh twice to get both >> sftp and ssh. The decrease in build time for only sftp is neglible. > > Hm, speaking against what I've often been advocating (reducing build > time by factoring out dependenies etc)... > > I think the simplest and most straightforward solution is to just > split the packaging into > openssh-ssh and openssh-sftp, where openssh-sftp packages just what is > needed for handling > the sftp-server in cooperation with dropbear. It could possibly also > include the sftp-client if > desired/needed.
That's already the case now. The problem is the PROVIDES overlap since the Poky people decided a distro could only have one true ssh implementation instead of choosing it per image. So if your distro doesn't set the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_sshd you get those nagging messages during parsing that scare users and make consultants rich. OE .dev isn't a lot better with the misguided DISTRO_SSH_DAEMON, but at least it doesn't show those nag messages. _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
