On (29/06/11 12:36), Phil Blundell wrote: > On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:27 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On 06/27/2011 08:24 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > > > -PR = "r1" > > > +PR = "r3" > > > > a nitpick though not wrong but should be r2 > > Is it official policy that PRs need to be sequential?
no. sometimes people might think two things changed to bump it by 2 and sometimes it could be that you forgot to submit 1 change There seem to be > various precedents for incrementing it by more than one in a single > checkin, see for example d3fc33760a80b0a067b41ff88e99941f1c40c8f9 and > 993a2367f881f1f4eaa10339cde93c7058660d67. If it's meant to only go up > by one each time then I guess I can cope with that but it would require > a bit of extra mangling at my end. > > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core -- -Khem _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
