On 07/06/2011 10:31 AM, Anders Darander wrote: > Hi Darren, > > On 6 jul 2011, at 18:37, "Darren Hart" <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Please see the following commit log: >> >> commit 3b49416fc7a7ee9bfe722f2e6089aa18df41dc58 Author: Darren Hart >> <[email protected]> Date: Tue Mar 8 17:09:10 2011 -0800 >> >> kernel/bbclass: rework kernel and module classes to allow for >> building out-of-tree modul >> >> >> In particular, the following: >> >> Care is also taken to clean the hostprogs in scripts, and the >> modules are responsible for building them as needed. Although it is >> unclear to me if this is really necessary, especially considering >> that modules put these bits back as soon as they compile. If we are >> not generating an sstate package, I suspect we can ignore these. >> >> The scripts are recreated during the build of module.bbclass >> derived recipes. Are you trying to build modules independently of >> this method? Richard expressed concerns about not including host >> specific binaries in the sstate, which was part of the reason this >> approach was taken. > > Thanks for pointing out this, especially the first sentence in this > paragraph. No matter how many times I've looked at both the recipes > in question, as well as the meta/classes directory, I haven't noticed > that the old, inherited recipes were not using module.bbclass, but > rather inherited module-base.bbclass directly. I'll assume that once > I change that, and fix the recipes properly all my issues will go > away. > > Once more, thanks for pointing me to the real problem.
Excellent, please keep us posted! -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
