On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:34 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Richard Purdie > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 11:06 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Richard Purdie > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 23:48 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Khem Raj <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > With this changeset we add new recipes for 0.9.32 and make that > >> >> > default > >> >> > preference. Then the git recipe are moved to track the latest master. > >> >> > systemd related fixes are separately applied to both git recipe and > >> >> > 0.9.32 > >> >> > recipes > >> >> > > >> >> > Both sets work for arm,mips,ppc,x86,x86-64 > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > -Khem > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > The following changes since commit > >> >> > 4eb3abaa5f4b5df0314dc0d503298d65cd203259: > >> >> > > >> >> > uclibc-0.9.32: Implement execvpe and refresh scheduler functions > >> >> > (2011-07-05 13:53:05 -0700) > >> >> > > >> >> > are available in the git repository at: > >> >> > git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib > >> >> > kraj/uclibc-0.9.32 > >> >> > > >> >> > http://cgit.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/log/?h=kraj/uclibc-0.9.32 > >> >> > > >> >> > Khem Raj (5): > >> >> > uclibc: Add recipes for 0.9.32 release > >> >> > tcmode-default: Define UCLIBCVERSION and set it to 0.9.32 > >> >> > uclibc_git: Move SRCREV past 0.9.32 release > >> >> > >> >> I have update PV in above commit to 0.9.32+0.9.33-rc0 instead of > >> >> 0.9.32+gitr${SRCPV} which is troublesome to use with git > >> > > >> > Can you expand a little more about what was troublesome with it? > >> > > >> > Is there a revision being specified for the uclibc git recipe? > >> > >> since its master git I have to change SRCREV frquently and if I do not bump > >> PR it ends up with dependency problems while generating image since > >> the SHAs are random > >> and they are getting into PV sometimes opkg thinks the version is > >> smaller than the previous > >> one and opkg does not like it. that aside 0.9.32+0.9.33-rc0 explains > >> the recipes PV better IMO > > > > Could you at least add the SRCREV you're using the recipe please? I > > didn't look really hard but I couldn't seem to find it when I last > > looked... > > huh. They are in recipes see toward the end here > > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/uclibc-0.9.32&id=ce07260090bbc11801e96657f1596ec23f793cce > > and for 0.9.32 here > > http://git.openembedded.org/cgit.cgi/openembedded-core-contrib/commit/?h=kraj/uclibc-0.9.32&id=49aea570ecc45bb7a655d9ca955272c3734c8696 > > or do u mean in some other form ?
No, I just missed somehow when reading the patch originally, I was surprised it wasn't there... Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
