On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 07:17 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Paul Eggleton > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday 08 July 2011 06:21:16 Khem Raj wrote: > >> If oe-core never supported older kernel than 2.6.37 then setting it to > >> 2.6.37 would be better IMO > > > > It's not necessarily just about oe-core - it's about what layers get used on > > top, and some of those will be using kernels older than 2.6.37. > > Its similar to a situation where some of the layers might be using > gcc older than 4.6.0 but we still chose 4.6.0 > in default distro vars. There always is a possibility to override it > if user has to.
For now, I've merged the 2.6.16 patch since there seem to be good reasons for making things at least that recent. Its certainly better than 2.4! :) Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
