> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Phil Blundell > Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 8:34 AM > To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer > Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH 4/7] binutils: package unpackaged files > > On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 16:26 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > @@ -35,11 +35,13 @@ FILES_${PN}-symlinks = " \ > > > ${bindir}/c++filt \ > > > ${bindir}/gprof \ > > > ${bindir}/ld \ > > > + ${bindir}/ld.bfd \ > > > ${bindir}/nm \ > > > ${bindir}/objcopy \ > > > ${bindir}/objdump \ > > > ${bindir}/ranlib \ > > > ${bindir}/readelf \ > > > + ${bindir}/elfedit \ > > > ${bindir}/size \ > > > ${bindir}/strip" > > > > Nitin, do you know if the ld.bfd above is a hardlinked copy of ld? > > If you're getting ld.bfd at all (at least with our current recipes) > then > it probably means that ${bindir}/ld is gold. So in that case they > oughtn't to be symlinked. > Just verified that ld.bfd is a soft link to i586-poky-linux-ld.bfd
So what is the right think here, rm -f ld.bfd, or putting it in the symlinks package is good? Nitin > p. > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
