Op 22 jul. 2011, om 17:11 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: > On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 16:54 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote: >> Op 22 jul. 2011, om 16:49 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven: >> >>> Since we're updating the tune file format, it makes sense to abstract >>> the compiler tune arguments at this point too. This means that should >>> these need to be overridden at any point, the original values can >>> still be obtained in a similar manner to the other TUNE* variables. >>> >>> Whilst this isn't strictly necessary for any current need, its likely >>> good practise to standardise this behaviour. >> >> So if I'm reading the patch correctly this doesn't result in a >> behaviour change, it just shuffles the definitions around in >> preparation for Mark's tune overhaul. > > Yes. > > I'm trying to split the work Mark and I have done into logical chunks we > can review and these are the pieces to setup the externally facing > variables we need. > > I've not yet finished the patches which change the tune files themselves > but we have a pretty good idea of what the finished result needs to look > like to get all this working which we have experimented and tested with.
After some changes to meta-ti to move aside the tune files in there 'bitbake -e' is functionally the same. So for arm926 and cortexa8: Tested-by: Koen Kooi <[email protected]> regards, Koen _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
