On 7/25/11 9:08 AM, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:47 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote: >> From: Mark Hatle <[email protected]> >> >> Fix the issue where the generated header differs based on the bitsize of the >> target at the time of building. >> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <[email protected]> >> --- >> meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils.inc | 4 +++- >> .../linux-libc-headers-yocto_git.bb | 5 ++++- >> .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.37.2.bb | 5 ++++- >> .../linux-libc-headers_2.6.39.bb | 5 +++++ >> meta/recipes-support/apr/apr_1.4.2.bb | 8 ++++++-- >> meta/recipes-support/beecrypt/beecrypt_4.2.1.bb | 8 ++++++-- >> 6 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > The changes in linux-libc-header and linux-libc-headers-yocto don't seem > to be related to the description above.
Yes, description is misleading. The changes to the linux-libc-headers removed a set of files that had different contents when built for different bitsize. > Also, the binutils.inc change seems to be missing a PR bump. > > The changes in apr and beecrypt look like they are probably fine, though > it would be nice for the subject line to mention the names of the > recipes being changed. This can be split or kept as a unit. I kept it as a single unit to show that these changes are all related. They don't change the contents of anything -- but resolve conflicts in header files. --Mark > p. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
