On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 17:23 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 14:42 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > To try and help preserve my sanity when pulling the various multilib
> > patches together, I've merged these six patches, along with a patch
> > incrementing bitbake's miniumum version requirement for the
> > bb.utils.contains usage.
>
> FWIW, the bitbake minimum version check (at least in its current form)
> doesn't buy much in this sort of situation because you get a parse error
> before the event handler in sanity.bbclass ever runs. I think this
> happened last time there was a bitbake-affecting change too although I
> don't recall the details.
>
> Perhaps adding something like:
>
> __sane_bitbake := "${oe.check_bb_version_sanity}"
>
> to the top of bitbake.conf would improve matters, I dunno.
Ouch, yes, we probably should do something like this.
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
