On Thursday 28 July 2011 08:48:43 Cui, Dexuan wrote:
> Saul Wold wrote on 2011-07-28:
> > On 07/27/2011 10:25 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> >> For some reason when I get to do_rootfs for core-image-sato when using
> >> rpms I run into an issue in that:
> >>
> >> ${PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-${DEFAULTTUNE}}
> >>
> >> Isn't expanding or taking the assignment in
> >> meta/conf/machine/include/tune-ppcFOO.inc but just using what it
> >> found in meta/conf/bitbake.conf
> >
> > I believe that I am seeing this also with an atom-pc build, where the
> > PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS seems OK, but ends up just being i586 instead of a
> > list of ARCHS that includes core2 (which atom-pc should be).
>
> Hi, I'm suffering from the exactly same issue... :-(
> I don't know why PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-${DEFAULTTUNE} isn't expending
> yet.
It seems to me that ??= gets confused because the variable name needs
expanding. If you change the ${DEFAULTTUNE} reference to core2 in
PACKAGE_EXTRA_ARCHS_tune-${DEFAULTTUNE} ??= "${TARGET_ARCH}" it all works. I
don't know if that indicates a BitBake bug or whether we should try to work
around it.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
