On Jul 28, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Lu, Lianhao wrote: > Richard Purdie wrote on 2011-07-27: >> Since we now handle GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER in gcc-configure-common.inc: >> >> 's#\(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER[^ ]*\)\( *"/lib.*\)#\1 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR\2#' >> > > It seems to me that this patch may not be removed. The above code in > gcc-configure-common.inc said it only useful for SDK. For gcc-cross, it > doesn't change /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 to /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 as > what the 64bithack.patch does. > > -Lianhao
Agreed, seeing similar issues on ppc64. I think the sed line might not be doing with Richard intended. We get: ./i386/linux.h:#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER SYSTEMLIBS_DIR "/lib/ld-linux.so.2" ./i386/linux64.h:#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER32 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR "/lib/ld-linux.so.2" ./i386/linux64.h:#define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2" - k > >> we can drop the patch which changes a hardcoded value for this. >> >> No PR bump since there is no code change resulting from this, its just >> a cleanup. >> >> There is still a valid question over the remainder of this patch and >> its interaction with multilib configurations. >> >> Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <[email protected]> >> --- >> .../recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/64bithack.patch | 13 ------------- >> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/64bithack.patch | 13 ------------- >> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-core mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
