On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:52 AM, Phil Blundell <ph...@gnu.org> wrote: > Actually, to some extent I consider it a bit of a misfeature that the > layer priority is specified by the layer rather than by the user in > bblayers.conf, since this makes it harder to vary the stack-up order > without local hackery to the layer files. For example, meta-oe > currently sets itself to a higher priority than oe-core, but I've found > that it generally seems to suit me better if meta-oe is actually the > lower-priority layer.
Agreed. It also means that the priority knowledge is split between layer.conf and bblayers.conf today, as config/class priority is determined by order of entries in BBLAYERS, whereas recipe priority is determined by layer.conf. -- Christopher Larson clarson at kergoth dot com Founder - BitBake, OpenEmbedded, OpenZaurus Maintainer - Tslib Senior Software Engineer, Mentor Graphics _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core