I agree. I don't see reason for dropping parallelism completely. There is a
real gain when running on beefier machines. Making it configurable would
probably be best. Or just drop it to a saner value, like 20 or 10.
- Markus
On 16/08/2017, 2.53, "Mark Hatle"
<openembedded-core-boun...@lists.openembedded.org on behalf of
mark.ha...@windriver.com> wrote:
It would probably be better if this was configurable with a 'safe' default.
Moving from parallel to single will greatly affect the overall performance
on
larger build machines (lots of memory and cores) that can handle the load
vs a
typical development machine.
--Mark
On 8/15/17 4:40 PM, leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Leonardo Sandoval <leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com>
>
> gpg signing in file batches (which was default to 100) is a memory
expensive
> computation, causing trouble in some host machines (even on production AB
> as seen on the bugzilla ID). Also, in terms of performance, there is no
real
> gain when rpm signing is done in batches. Considering the latter issues,
perform the
> rpm signing serially.
>
> Log showing errors observed recently at AB workers:
>
> | gpg: signing failed: Cannot allocate memory
> | gpg: signing failed: Cannot allocate memory
> | error: gpg exec failed (2)
> |
/home/pokybuild/yocto-autobuilder/yocto-worker/nightly-oe-selftest/build/build/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/base-passwd/3.5.29-r0/deploy-rpms/core2_64/base-passwd-dev-3.5.29-r0.core2_64.rpm:
>
> [YOCTO #11914]
>
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Sandoval
<leonardo.sandoval.gonza...@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py b/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py
> index f4d8b10e4b..5c7985a856 100644
> --- a/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py
> +++ b/meta/lib/oe/gpg_sign.py
> @@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ class LocalSigner(object):
> if fsk_password:
> cmd += "--define '_file_signing_key_password %s' " %
fsk_password
>
> - # Sign in chunks of 100 packages
> - for i in range(0, len(files), 100):
> - status, output = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd + '
'.join(files[i:i+100]))
> + # Sign packages
> + for f in files:
> + status, output = oe.utils.getstatusoutput(cmd + ' ' + f)
> if status:
> raise bb.build.FuncFailed("Failed to sign RPM packages:
%s" % output)
>
>
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
