On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Kanavin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/02/2017 06:02 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> Em 2 de out de 2017 11:57 AM, "Alexander Kanavin" >> <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> escreveu: >> >> On 10/02/2017 05:52 PM, Otavio Salvador wrote: >> >> @@ -551,6 +551,8 @@ class RpmPM(PackageManager): >> if self.d.getVar('PACKAGE_FEED_SIGN') == '1': >> gpg_opts = 'repo_gpgcheck=1\n' >> gpg_opts += >> 'gpgkey=file://%s/pki/packagefeed-gpg/PACKAGEFEED-GPG-KEY-%s-%s\n' >> % (self.d.getVar('sysconfdir'), self.d.getVar('DISTRO'), >> self.d.getVar('DISTRO_CODENAME')) >> + elif: self.d.getVar('RPM_SIGN_PACKAGES') == '0': >> + gpg_opts = 'gpgcheck=0\n' >> else: >> gpg_opts = '' >> >> >> Still wrong! I'm kind of getting tired though. Can you figure it out >> for yourself, this time? >> >> >> Even better, I'll leave it broken. >> >> I use I'll myself so good luck with rpm. > > FWIW, the wrong part in this patch is that when PACKAGE_FEED_SIGN is set to > 1, but RPM_SIGN_PACKAGES is set to 0, you will not get gpgsign=0 added to > configuration.
Good that you know how to fix it. I gave up as you said, I got tired. Being not an active RPM user I took the time to check and test it and got a non-helpful attitude from one of its maintainers so please go ahead and fix it if you care. I got tired too. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750 -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
