On 10/03/2017 10:44 PM, Bystricky, Juro wrote: > >> While I understand ARM/ is wrong, why is removing the db_cv_mutex a >> correct fix instead of ie. s/ARM/nios2/ ? The patch description does not >> explain that. > > With the relatively recent commit > http://git.yoctoproject.org/cgit.cgi/poky/commit/meta/recipes-support/db?id=f4e8e9242c5df095b52688b083df3c9d36e7144b > some nios2 builds (uboot, core-image-minimal, etc) were broken due to db > trying to > use ARM instructions in mutexes. The reason was db "configure" used the > cached entry > from nios2-linux (which was incorrect). So the remedy was to remove the > incorrect cached entry > and let db "configure" figure out which is the proper mutex to use. > Besides, I don't even know if nios2/gcc-assembly exists. > Also, none of other Linux info files provides this entry (db_cv_mutex). >
This should be in the commit message ... -- Best regards, Marek Vasut -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
