On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:30 +0200, Martin Jansa wrote: > * not everybody needs i915, i965 > > Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <[email protected]> > --- > meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc | 4 ++++ > meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri_7.11.bb | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc > b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc > index 603438e..be6905c 100644 > --- a/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc > +++ b/meta/recipes-graphics/mesa/mesa-dri.inc > @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ DEFAULT_PREFERENCE = "-1" > > EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-driver=dri --disable-egl --disable-gallium > --without-gallium-drivers" > > +MACHINE_DRI_MODULES ?= "" > +PACKAGE_ARCH = > "${@['${MACHINE_ARCH}','${TUNE_PKGARCH}'][bb.data.getVar('MACHINE_DRI_MODULES',d,1) > == '']}" > +EXTRA_OECONF += "--with-dri-drivers=swrast,${MACHINE_DRI_MODULES}" > + > python populate_packages_prepend() { > import os.path
Whilst I understand the problem, I don't like this solution. Particularly, it means that the meas-dri package needs to be marked as machine specific which I don't like the idea of at all. How about we do this on a per architecture basis? Cheers, Richard _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
