>> Isn't it "Upstream-Status: Backport [URL]"? >> >> Also, what were the changes in v2 and v3 of this patch? > > Yes, it should be backport and the header is to be included in the > patch file, not on the commit log
Sorry, I thought it was Accepted because there is not (yet) any official upstream version with the patch. And my v2 and v3 patches were the attempts at fixing my initially botched Upstream-Status reference. I guess that wasn't clear from the context. Patch v4 in next message. I switched to Backport and removed it from the commit message. -- Kristian -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
