I also need to look at the UPSTREAM_CHECK_URI for this recipe since it isn't finding the latest version and telling me to update the package.
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:02 PM, S. Lockwood-Childs <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 03:17:25PM -0500, Derek Straka wrote: > > I have several customers who have optimized for space and would like to > see > > the capability maintained unless core removes the ability to split python > > packages out. They also remove the *.py files in favor of *.pyo files > (via > > a custom packaging mechanism). I have automated tests that go through > the > > module importing on each of the meta-python packages to ensure it works > on > > minimal python installations. When other contributors don't do provide > > that functionality, I either catch it when I do package update or when it > > breaks for one of my customers. I'm fine if you don't want to perform > the > > checks yourself and it breaks my use case with missing dependencies, but > I > > would prefer that you don't remove the dependencies that are currently in > > place. Thanks. > > Me too -- some of my projects still use NAND for rootfs, where space is > tight and > ability to split out python modules is very useful. Thus it is not an > unused > feature, though many projects have SD/eMMC for rootfs and those ones > generally > will not care about it. >
-- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
