On Wed, 2018-01-10 at 09:55 -0800, Martin Kelly wrote: > On 01/05/2018 06:57 AM, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > > > > On 01/05/2018 01:47 PM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > > > > > Do we even need gnomebase-meson with this? I can see a future > > > where > > > GNOME is entirely Meson and then we could just switch the > > > default > > > GNOMEBASEBUILDCLASS from autotools to meson. > > > > > > (prior art being the tarball compression type) > > > > I'm fine with this. Just so everyone else knows: RP has actually > > made > > the change already, and merged everything to master, so the YP > > supports > > meson as a first class citizen now. > > > > Alex > Technically I'd call it a 0.9-class citizen, as the SDK doesn't work > yet > :), but still a whole lot better than 0.
We'll get there and patches are very welcome. Also *very* welcome would be some SDK tests which illustrate the problem so we can a) fix it and b) ensure it doesn't regress again! Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
