On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Andre McCurdy <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:40 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Recipe upgrade statistics:
>> ...
>>
>> TOTAL: attempted=120 succeeded=45(37.50%) failed=75(62.50%)
>
> Giving these percentages to two decimal places seems a little over the top.
>
> Perhaps the stats could be made even more readable by just giving the
> pass rate, instead of both pass and failure rates, e.g.
>
> xxx: attempted=120 succeeded=45 failed=75 (success rate 37%)
>
> Sorting the lists for each category would improve readability too.
An important aspect is to analyze the errors in the upgrade process. I
went through all the upgrades and:
- go-dep is confusing. It failed but I essentially bumped the SRCREV
so I don't know why it failed
- cmake has multiple errors:
- added checksums in cmake_${PV}.bb instead of cmake.inc
- removal of non-patch files by mistake
- did not handled the -native recipe
--
Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854 Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
