On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:22 AM, James Limbouris
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using meta-toolchain-qte in the past to cross compile a Qt app, 
> and the Linux kernel.
> Recently I replaced my old SDK image with a fresh one, and found that I could 
> not link vmlinux anymore.
>
> When building the kernel, I use the following ('rica' is the distribution 
> name):
> export 
> PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots/i686-ricasdk-linux/usr/bin/armv5te-rica-linux-gnueabi/
> make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-rica-linux-gnueabi- zImage
>
> The new error message is:
>
> Kernel: arch/arm/boot/Image is ready
>  AS      arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o
>  GZIP    arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.gz
>  CC      arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o
>  AS      arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.o
>  LD      arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
> arm-rica-linux-gnueabi-ld: cannot find libgcc.a: No such file or directory
>
> Comparing the build with the old sdk to the build with the new one, I find 
> that the command line for linking has changed from:
>
> arm-rica-linux-gnueabi-ld -EL --defsym zreladdr=0x80008000 --defsym 
> initrd_phys=0x80800000 --defsym params_phys=0x80000100 -p --no-undefined -X 
> /usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots/arm-rica-linux-gnueabi/usr/lib/arm-rica-linux-gnueabi/4.5.4/libgcc.a
>  -T arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o 
> arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.o arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o -o 
> arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
>
> to:
>
> arm-rica-linux-gnueabi-ld -EL --defsym zreladdr=0x80008000 --defsym 
> initrd_phys=0x80800000 --defsym params_phys=0x80000100 -p --no-undefined -X 
> libgcc.a -T arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux.lds 
> arch/arm/boot/compressed/head.o arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.o 
> arch/arm/boot/compressed/misc.o -o arch/arm/boot/compressed/vmlinux
>
> So libgcc.a has lost its path qualification.
> I also straced the two linker commands, and found that they differed in one 
> sequence.
>
> Old:
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, 
> st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots", 
> {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots/arm-rica-linux-gnueabi",
>  {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
>
> New:
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, 
> st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots", 
> {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
> lstat64("/usr/local/rica-eglibc-i686-armv5te/sysroots/arm-rica-linux-gnueabi",
>  0xbffe67cc) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
>
> Both toolchains are looking for a sysroot at 'arm-rica-linux-gnueabi', but 
> the new toolchain should be looking at 'armv5te-rica-linux-gnueabi', as the 
> names have changed.
> I'm not yet acquainted with the darker arts of toolchain generation. Can 
> anyone help with this?
>

can you post the build logs and configure logs of
binutils sdk

> Regards,
> James Limbouris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-core mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core

Reply via email to