On 10/20/2011 09:24 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:>
> I'm in favour of having info in the recipe (or bbappend!) who is looking
> after it if it doesn't end up in the output package.
>
> Regardless of where to put the info, I would like to propose to orphan every
> recipe in OE-core and ask for volunteers. There's a ton of stuff I want to
> look after (bluez, gstreamer, pulse, avahi, X) which already has a maintainer
> from its yocto/poky/whatever legacy, but I feel is not being looked after
> with much attention. And adding to the problem is that most yocto people
> aren't using OE-core, but poky.
I feel the need to point out that you don't have to be the named
maintainer to submit a patch.
Personally I'd be happy to see maintainer ship go to other members of
the community.
I think a better approach would be to seek volunteers before we orphan
things? That way things which don't receive volunteers can stay with the
current maintainer?
Cheers,
Joshua
--
Joshua Lock
Yocto Project "Johannes factotum"
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
