On Sun, 2018-03-04 at 14:40 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > I'm sorry, for some reason this thread in Gmail starts with the morty > review you've sent, but when I look in my favorite mutt, I see that > my replies were linked with pyro review where you're right the files > aren't included. > > Still I would like to see what's the diff between gcc-6.4 in morty > and pyro and gcc-6.4 which was in master (and there is still gcc-6.3 > in rocko which should imho be upgraded first to preserve continuity).
Right, I was looking at pyro-next since that was the patch you'd replied to! I'm not sure why those files are there, they likely shouldn't be. Juro? I also agree on upgrading rocko gcc6, the trouble there is testing, its not the default compiler and our testing doesn't cover it :/. Anyone willing to sort out a patch? Cheers, Richard -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
