On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:47 PM, Victor Kamensky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Khem, > > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Khem Raj wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 1:50 PM, Victor Kamensky <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Victor Kamensky <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc | 3 +-- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc >>> b/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc >>> index c938760..d122359 100644 >>> --- a/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc >>> +++ b/meta/recipes-kernel/systemtap/systemtap_git.inc >>> @@ -15,8 +15,7 @@ SRC_URI = "git://sourceware.org/git/systemtap.git \ >>> >>> file://0001-staprun-stapbpf-don-t-support-installing-a-non-root.patch \ >>> " >>> >>> -# systemtap doesn't support mips >>> -COMPATIBLE_HOST = >>> '(x86_64|i.86|powerpc|arm|aarch64|microblazeel).*-linux' >>> +COMPATIBLE_HOST = >>> '(x86_64|i.86|powerpc|arm|aarch64|microblazeel|mips).*-linux' >>> >> >> Looks ok. Can we enable mipsel as well ? > > > Above expression, effectively 'mips.*-linux', does match 'mipsel' as well, > does not it? It matches mips64. > > I did test basic systemtap operations on qemumips, and > qemumips64 machines, worked ok to me. I noticed some small quirks but they > were similar to one that arm machine has. I am not saying > that MIPS support in systemtap is perfect, it is new architecture > for systemtap after all, there could be some bugs. But I believe > it is good enough to be enabled in OE. > > I don't see any easy virtual mipsel based machine so I cannot test > it right away. But I don't see a reson why it would not work in LE > mode.
ok thanks for clarifying. I wanted to ask if it works on mipsel or not, not about the regexp, but I see I could have framed it better -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
