On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 3:03 AM, Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kana...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 04/11/2018 11:38 AM, Andre McCurdy wrote: >> >> I played around with completely replacing openssl with libressl a year >> or so ago and it went fairly smoothly (at least as far as I tested). >> That was with libressl 2.4.2 and my recipe built with autotools rather >> than cmake though. Did you try to build with autotools? That still >> appears to be the option mentioned first in the libressl README. > > That's not however the options I would take first, as the recipe maintainer > :) Autotools is horrible in many ways; while cmake is not great, it's > definitely less horrible.
Well, as you're the one writing the recipe you get to make the choice :-) But if one "just works" and the other requires patches that might sway the choice a little. I wasn't sure if you'd even looked at the autotools build. Either option is a vast improvement on the openssl build system though. Libressl seems to have done a lot of valuable cleanup in that respect. -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list Openembeddedemail@example.com http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core