On 04/16/2018 07:05 PM, Andreas Müller wrote:
I am not happy plastering patches around for musl. This gets even
worse when I see patches like this : Just wipe away security checks
unconditionally - the developers did introduce this check not just for
fun I guess...
I have seen this already elsewhere so: musl maintainers please take
care not to modify code for glibc!
I can see I rebased this patch. So I think I need to reply.
I agree with you that musl related patches should not affect glibc.
How about we using something like SRC_URI_append_libc-musl to organize
the musl related patches?
Or do you have some other suggestion?
Openembedded-core mailing list