On Sun, 2018-04-15 at 23:50 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> index 97365a21dc..b4e5539575 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-runtime.inc
> @@ -24,8 +24,10 @@ RUNTIMELIBITM_nios2 = ""
> RUNTIMELIBITM_microblaze = ""
> RUNTIMELIBITM_riscv32 = ""
> RUNTIMELIBITM_riscv64 = ""
> +RUNTIMELIBSSP ?= ""
> +RUNTIMELIBSSP_mingw ?= "libssp"
>
> -RUNTIMETARGET = "libssp libstdc++-v3 libgomp libatomic
> ${RUNTIMELIBITM} \
> +RUNTIMETARGET = "libstdc++-v3 libgomp libatomic ${RUNTIMELIBITM} \
> ${@bb.utils.contains_any('FORTRAN', [',fortran',',f77'],
> 'libquadmath', '', d)} \
> "
> RUNTIMETARGET_append_x86 = " libmpx"
This last piece looks like you removed libssp for everywhere, glibc
included except mingw?
Is the source file you included in the new recipe the same as the one
in the gcc source but linked differently? If so, I'd be tempted to
build that gcc-runtime with a musl specific do_compile addition...
I assume this is post 2.5 material as its fairly invasive changes at
the tail end of a release...
Cheers,
Richard
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
