On 05/15/2018 07:07 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
On 15.05.2018 17:03, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
On 05/15/2018 05:04 PM, Stefan Agner wrote:
This follows up on the discussion a while ago:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg104996.html
Took me a moment to realize all three patches are specific to
opkg/dpkg and do not change how rpm (or general 'postinst handling')
works. Perhaps you could amend the commit messages to emphasize that?
Patch 1 has opkg in the subject.
Patch 2/3 mention opkg/dpkg in the commit log.
Patch 3 also really edits the DpkgOpkgRootfs class, which should make it
rather obvious.
But I agree for patch 2 it would be good to emphasize it.
How about adding this after the first paragraph:
The behavior for rpm stays the same.
That, and amend the commit summaries:
patch 2:
run-postinsts: for dpkg/opkg, do not rely on /etc/*-postinsts
patch 3:
rootfs.py: for dpkg/opkg, don't install postinsts if package management
is present
Otherwise those one liners can give the wrong impression.
Alex
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
