On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Randy MacLeod <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/20/2018 10:59 AM, akuster808 wrote: >> >> Maybe a bug is in order and then we might be able to add it to the 2.6 >> planning? > > There is meta-qemuarma9: > https://github.com/OverC/meta-qemuarma9.git > I'm not an arm man but would it make sense for oe-core to > drop qemuarm and use qemuarma9?
Presumably that name was chosen just to avoid a clash with the qemuarm machine name used in oe-core? If/when we update the CPU used in the oe-core qemu ARM machine, I vote we continue to just call it "qemuarm". -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
