On 18 June 2018 at 17:25, Mark Hatle <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/18/18 10:48 AM, Ross Burton wrote: >> Both busybox and coreutils provide mktemp, and the only difference between >> those >> (and standalone mktemp) is that coreutils supports --suffix. > > I've got no objections to this.. but I do have a question/comment. > > Is mktemp packaged by itself in coreutils or do you need the larger coreutils > to > get it. (I'm not actually sure it matters, but in the past there were some > cases where you might not want all of coreutils, but wanted mktemp...)
We don't have a small or large coreutils. Maybe that's a WR-ism? Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
