On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Khem Raj <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/10/18 7:44 AM, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
>> Commits 1202307b24 ("lsbinitscripts: don't use update-alternatives")
>> cdcebd81c87 ("initscripts: don't use update-alternatives") and
>> 061fa614cec ("update-alternatives.bbclass: refuse to manage SysV init
>> scripts") make sure that the lsbinitscripts and initscripts packages
>> conflict with eachother and can't be alternatives.
>>
>> lsb has a hardcoded dependency on lsbinitscripts which makes it
>> impossible to install on systems using initscripts (acl depends on
>> initscripts) and lsbinitscripts also has a runtime dependency on the
>> full util-linux package making it an unwanted dependency on busybox
>> systems.
>>
>> Therefore introduce VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts to choose between the
>> versions of /etc/init.d/functions and allow installing lsb alongside
>> initscripts avoiding the full util-linux dependency.
>>
>> Default it to lsbinitscripts so we don't have a change in the existing
>> behavior; distros/users can override it in their conf when needed.
>>
>
> We already have PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_initd-functions I wonder if that is
> the right option to use here.
(I've sent patch v2 which fixes a build-error causing typo, sorry for it :)
We could use PREFERRED_RPROVIDER_initd-functions but that currently
defaults to "initscripts". In all my layers nothing is using that
variable, so would it be ok to change its default to lsbinitscripts to
preserve the current default lsb/util-linux behaviour?
Or are you ok with using it as is, leaving the default to "initscripts"
and just change the lsb dependency?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ra...@ni.com>
>> ---
>> meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc | 1 +
>> meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb | 3 +--
>> meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
>> b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
>> index e65c1ed323..37e7478ea0 100644
>> --- a/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
>> +++ b/meta/conf/distro/include/default-providers.inc
>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_update-alternatives ?=
>> "update-alternatives-opkg"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_apm ?= "apm"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_alsa-state ?= "alsa-state"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_getopt ?= "util-linux-getopt"
>> +VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts ?= "lsbinitscripts"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_wireless-tools ?= "iw wireless-tools"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_base-utils ?= "busybox"
>> VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_base-utils-hwclock ?= "busybox-hwclock"
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
>> index df4812e4bc..6cb1751664 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/lsb/lsb_5.0.bb
>> @@ -8,8 +8,7 @@ LSB_CORE_x86 = "lsb-core-ia32"
>> LSB_CORE_x86-64 = "lsb-core-amd64"
>> RPROVIDES_${PN} += "${LSB_CORE}"
>>
>> -# lsb_release needs getopt, lsbinitscripts
>> -RDEPENDS_${PN} += "${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_getopt} lsbinitscripts"
>> +RDEPENDS_${PN} += "${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_getopt} ${VIRTUAL-RUNTIME_initscripts}"
>>
>> LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://README;md5=12da544b1a3a5a1795a21160b49471cf"
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
>> b/meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
>> index 53d100ce74..74547b0773 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-extended/packagegroups/packagegroup-core-lsb.bb
>> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ RDEPENDS_packagegroup-core-lsb-misc = "\
>> gettext \
>> gettext-runtime \
>> groff \
>> - lsbinitscripts \
>> + ${VIRTUAL_RUNTIME-initscripts} \
>> lsbtest \
>> lsof \
>> strace \
>>
--
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
