On 27 July 2018 at 00:51, Christopher Clark <[email protected]> wrote: > +ENABLE_EXTRA_TARGETS ?= "--enable-targets=${ARCH_EFI_EMULATION}"
This has an interesting implication in that it's not building support for all targets now, specifically buildhistory-diff shows that large chunks are no longer being built: --rw-r--r-- root root 15269 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/elfcpp/mips.h --rw-r--r-- root root 9539 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/elfcpp/powerpc.h --rw-r--r-- root root 5994 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/elfcpp/s390.h --rw-r--r-- root root 8243 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/elfcpp/sparc.h --rw-r--r-- root root 5654 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/elfcpp/tilegx.h --rw-r--r-- root root 329045 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/gold/powerpc.cc --rw-r--r-- root root 136896 ./usr/src/debug/binutils/2.31-r0/git/gold/sparc.cc etc (that's a diff, so the leading - is a removal marker) So binutils on x86 only support x86, but binutils for ARM supports all architectures. Inconsistency doesn't seem right. Can we *add* x86_64-pep to the target list? Or can we make all binutils just build their native formats? Ross -- _______________________________________________ Openembedded-core mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
